Zambia’s life expectancy is about 37 years.
Jul 31st, 2008 by admin
What occurred to you when you read that? I’ve heard people quote statistics like this before but it took an LTOV named Mark (thanks Mark, I’m stealing your aha! moment, hope it’s okay) describing his experience with a coworker for me to realize just a few of the implications of this. Like Mark, I will stick to cold hard figures and will not get into the emotional and social side of these issues. Lets look at the facts.
Canada’s life expectancy is roughly 78 years. Immediately what comes to mind for me when I hear this is that our lives are relatively twice as long as the average Zambian’s life, but there are other ways of thinking about this as well.
Right now most of you reading this are either in school, or working. If you are in school, you are in the development years during which you build the foundation for the rest of your life. Those of you working are in what we might call the “productive years.” You are getting experience and becoming experts in your field. You are raising families and becoming wise. If the average Canadian finishes school at about 20 years of age and retires around 60, we have just under 40 productive years. 40 years to gain seniority and raise our incomes; 40 years to gain and share our knowledge; 40 years to be part of the workforce. Now let’s return to Zambia.
In Zambia most people do not go to university but many go to school, so let’s say they enter the workforce at about 18 years of age. This means they have about 20 years of productivity to do all of these things my parents and their coworkers are doing. We have the same number of years in the workforce that they have to be alive. So what does this mean for Zambia? The most experienced person in a given workplace may only be 30 or 35 years old, and much less experienced than the most senior person at a similar business in Canada. My dad has been working (since the stone-age, haha, just kidding Daddy…) for about 30 years at the same company. That is a long time to learn the ropes and shift comfortably from coachee to coach. With the high turnover rate experienced in Zambia, companies have few coaches (and almost none with the amount of experience my dad has) and are constantly gaining and losing coachees and people they have just invested in coaching. AIDs, TB, and malaria are everywhere. Businesses here consciously plan for a certain number of their employees to die each year and with them dies experience and company knowledge and investment.
We talk a lot about capacity building at EWB. Let’s INVEST in PEOPLE and train them and coach them and spend time and money building their capabilities. We get frustrated wondering why NGO’s don’t invest in the capacity of their workers and get really involved in coaching them to be better at their jobs. Well, does it make economic sense for organizations that are so strapped for cash to be investing so much money and time building themselves on their staff? I would still argue yes, but you can see why this is a difficulty. I personally think that because the capacity of a worker has such a dire affect on his or her quality of work, NGO’s and businesses in Zambia need to work twice as hard to build their workers’ skills, but to many this is a financial risk they may not be willing to take. Furthermore, those organizations who do work on strong capacity building will face a challenge in continuously adding to the growth of their staff. They cannot pick up with everyone and continue training where they left off if a quarter of the staff is brand new. This applies to private businesses as well. How will they catch up or excel past us in sciences or engineering if their engineers have half as much time to accomplish the same or more than ours after being trained by relatively inexperienced people?
This issue puts strain on all industries and services, including those provided by the government. If the Canadian government invests in some sort of training for new teachers they expect that investment to benefit the country over the next 40 years. The Zambian government will have to carry out and pay for the same training at least twice as often. So it is with doctors, nurses, administrators and accountants alike, and any other profession invested in by the government. As if the government in a developing nation needs more strain..
A few of us JF’s were in Lusaka this past weekend, and we always look forward to going to a certain cafe where all the mzungus hang out because the food is great, the wireless internet is fast, and we always meet FASCINATING people when we are there (foreigners here tend to seek each other out and fall into conversation). We got into a discussion the other day with an American who runs an NGO that nurtures budding entrepreneurs and teaches them the skills they need to excel in business and train other entrepreneurs. He explained that when people are given skills and empowered to see that they can make a good life for themselves, they begin planning for the future. By helping young Zambians realize that they too can have powerful and productive futures, he has seen them increase use of condoms, stop drinking chibuku (not that all of them were doing this in the first place), and think ahead. They care more about their futures because they realize that they each have one. They learn to plan, save money, and take care of themselves more. He has observed this in every single person his organization has worked with and has recently won an award from the Zambian government because they have realized this fact too (his organization is called “Teach to Fish” and is run out of Lusaka. I’m sure it has a website for those of you who are interested). So what about the other 12 million he has not gotten to work with? How many of them are discouraged at the life ahead of them and don’t do these things because of that? A shortened lifespan has innumerable effects as well as causes.
This low level of life expectancy is cyclical. It is both a cause and an effect of itself. To demonstrate this, think about the average family size. It is not uncommon in villages to find families with 6 to 10 children. Not only does this make sense economically, since the family size basically equals the workforce of the family farm, but if people expect several of their children to die before the age of five (the stat is around 1/4 or 1/5) it is likely they will choose to have more kids. The other side of this is that those in villages have the least access to medical care and basic nutrition, which means these are the vulnerable people who are likely to die at an earlier age, contributing to this early life expectancy statistic.
Another example is that of teachers. The government has to train teachers about twice as often as those in Canada, so it must be tightfisted with spending in other areas. I spoke to a volunteer who said the elementary school in her village receives about ZMK 300,000 from the government each month. This is about USD 90. This means that the schools MUST charge fees. Hence, not everyone gets to go to school. Without proper education children are less likely to make steps towards a better quality of life for their future families. They are missing out on many key tools they need to excel in today’s fast-paced society, and are at a disadvantage compared to children around the world. And so the cycle of poverty continues…
EWB often runs a workshop called “Root Causes of Poverty.” Participants are split into groups and given a case study (telling about a typical family constrained by various circumstances to live in poverty), pads of post-it notes and a chart paper. They are told to brainstorm causes of poverty, record each on a sticky note, and stick them to the chart paper (sorry for all you environmentalists out there). Typically groups come up with countless sticky notes with everything from “western apathy” to “cultural traditions” to “lack of sanitation facilities.” Next, the groups are asked to each try and map out their notes on the chart paper and draw arrows to show the relationships between them. What causes what?
I urge those of you who have never done this workshop to try a mini version at home, scribbling your brainstorm on a piece of paper and connecting the words.
Those of you who HAVE done the workshop know that everyone starts out bound and determined to have a pretty little diagram, and by the end of the workshop the room is in chaos, and so is each chart paper as groups end up drawing a messy web of arrows tracing through and around every part of the page, connecting the various causes of poverty.
Does a lack of education cause inadequate drinking water sources? Or does the lack of adequate drinking water sources cause children to miss school since they are sick or fetching water all day, leading to a lack of education? Does the cultural aspect of large families propagate starvation or does the lack of nutrition (and hence, lack of health) from starvation cause people to have bigger families (so they can manage a bigger farm, have more surviving children, etc)?
An amusing tale often told among EWBers is that of one of our National Office staff going to work with one of our corporate sponsors and running this workshop with a bunch of CEO-types. By the end of the workshop one group proudly presented their neat, single-file line of arrows and causes, proclaiming that, “We’ve done it! We’ve found the root cause of poverty!”
“But what if inadequate health care not only causes high turnover rates, but is also caused by them since doctors have less experienced people training them?” (or one of the millions of other cyclical relationships within poverty’s vicious cycle. this one is purely an example) asked the N.O. member
“OH $#%*!” Cried the group, and began ripping everything off the paper to try and rearrange their neat little line. Of course the neat little line never reappeared.
For those of you in EWB who have done our Root Causes of Poverty workshop, life expectancy is another issue to add into the tangled web that shows how all causes of poverty are interconnected and there really is no “root cause.”
The idea behind Root Causes of Poverty is to demonstrate that poverty is not a problem with a solution. It is much more complex than that. Change is slow, but it IS happening, and when we in Canada, who are so detached and clueless really about what is going on over here, are wondering why progress is so slow and thinking there is an “answer” to poverty and why isn’t it just being solved, we need to remember this complexity and be empathetic towards the field workers on the front lines who are dealing with it despite receiving little support and being stretched very thin.
I challenge you all to really think about the implications of the devastating statistics you hear from day to day. What does this statistic mean for those involved in it? What are the massive effects and causes of these seemingly impersonal numbers?
I’m heading out to live in a village for a couple weeks so I hope to bring more insight into the reality of poverty and how this experience differs from my comfy corner here in Kafue where I have become accustomed to life. I’ll be staying in the small village of Kasaka with a family called the Sialuzus. I’ll talk to you all in a couple of weeks and I’ll be home in less than 4 (ahh!).
On a side note i have accidentally marked all my blog comments as spam (oops) and I don’t know how to undo this but feel free to try posting new ones even though I know the comments feature often doesn’twork for some reason. You can email me though
Lots of Zambian love heading your way!
-hb







